Supporting statement structure that shortlists

Copy the person specification into a two-column document. In the right-hand column write one concrete example for each criterion — what you did, in what context, and what changed as a result. Any criterion you cannot evidence is either a gap to acknowledge or a reason not to apply. This step takes twenty minutes and decides most of the outcome.

Opening, three or four lines. Who you are professionally, the post you are applying for, and the single strongest reason you fit it. No throat-clearing about how delighted you were to see the advertisement.

Why this school, one short paragraph. Something specific and verifiable, connected to what you would contribute. Shortlisters can tell a tailored paragraph from a generic one instantly, because the generic one would fit any school.

The evidence body, in the order of the person specification. Use the specification's own language as your subheadings or opening phrases. If it says "experience of delivering structured literacy interventions", start that paragraph with those words. This feels mechanical to write and reads as clear and complete, which is what you want.

Practice detail, not adjectives. "I am passionate about inclusion" evidences nothing. "I ran a daily fifteen-minute reading intervention with six Year 4 pupils, tracked it fortnightly with the class teacher, and handed over a record of what each child could read unaided by the end of term" evidences several criteria at once.

Safeguarding, briefly and correctly. One or two lines showing you understand it as a shared duty and a process — reporting to the designated safeguarding lead, recording, not investigating — is enough. Schools are wary of applications that never mention it.

Close, two lines. What you would bring in the first term, and your availability. Do not restate the whole statement.

Follow the advert. If it specifies a limit, stay inside it; if it does not, two sides of A4 is the working norm for teaching posts and rather less for support posts. Write in plain paragraphs with white space. Avoid tables, columns and graphics — many application systems strip them, and shortlisters read on screen.

Sending the same statement to several schools with the name changed. Ignoring an essential criterion entirely. Claiming responsibility that your references will not confirm. Writing about your own needs rather than the pupils'.

Leaving obvious typos in a document that argues you have high standards.

Most schools require their own form rather than a CV, because safer recruitment expects a full history. Complete every field, including a continuous employment history, and explain gaps plainly — study, caring, illness, a period of looking for work. A short factual explanation is never the problem; an unexplained gap invites a question you will not be there to answer.

Read it once against the grid and tick each criterion as you find its evidence. Read it once aloud to catch the sentences that only work in your head. Then check that the school's name is right in every place it appears.

If you are applying to several posts, the grid is reusable and the statement is not. Browse live school vacancies and write each one properly — a smaller number of tailored applications shortlists better than a larger number of near-identical ones.